Technical Committee
Sessions: PSC, PSDP, PSIM, PSO, PSPI
Click on a session title in the table
below to be connected to a description of the session from the printed program and
links for each available presentation. (Sessions
marked with *SG* indicate there were Smart Grid related papers in the session.)
|
Session Name |
||
|
|
||
|
Power System
Communications Committee |
||
|
Wed AM |
*SG* |
|
|
Wed PM |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Power System Dynamic
Performance Committee |
||
|
Tues AM |
*SG* |
Power System Stability Controls Subcommittee Meeting
and FACTS and Wind Power Paper Session |
|
Tues PM |
|
Generator Testing and Model Validation for Grid Code
Compliance |
|
Wed AM |
|
|
|
Wed PM |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Power System
Instrumentation and Measurements Committee |
||
|
Tues PM |
*SG* |
|
|
|
||
|
Power System Operations
Committee |
||
|
Mon PM |
|
|
|
Tues PM |
|
|
|
Wed AM |
|
|
|
Thur AM |
*SG* |
Impact of Wind Generation on Control Center Operations
and New Tools to Mitigate Risks |
|
Thur AM |
|
Operational Experiences in Handling Contingencies in
Control Centers |
|
|
||
|
Power System Planning and
Implementation Committee |
||
|
Mon PM |
*SG* |
|
|
Mon PM |
|
Solving Major Challenges in Transmission Asset
Investment in Competitive Environment |
|
Tues AM |
|
Generation and Transmission Planning Tools in the
Deregulated Paradigm |
|
Tues PM |
|
|
|
Wed PM |
*SG* |
|
*SG* PSCC
Security Subcommittee
Sponsored by: Power System
Communications Committee
Chair: F.
Cleveland, Xanthus Consulting International
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1184, Facilitating NERC CIP Compliance
with Secure Unified Remote IED Access Control
T. JAFFRAY, SUBNET
Solutions Inc.
A. HAMDON, SUBNET Solutions
Inc.
B. TATERA, Pacific Gas and
Electric
• 09GM0929, Secure SCADA Network Supporting
NERC CIP
M. ZAFIROVIC-VUKOTIC,
RuggedCom
R. MOORE, RuggedCom
M. LESLIE, RuggedCom
R. MIDENCE, RuggedCom
M. POZZUOLI, RuggedCom
• 09GM0516, Collaborative, Trust-Based Security
Mechanisms for a Regional Utility Intranet [Transaction
Number: TPWRS-00748-2007]
G. COATES, Air Force
Institute of Technology
K. HOPKINSON, Air Force Institute
of Technology
S. GRAHAM, Air Force
Institute of Technology
S. KURKOWSKI, Air Force
Institute of Technology
PSCC New Concepts Subcommittee
Sponsored by: Power System
Communications Committee
Chair: D. Nordell,
Xcel Energy
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0799, Investigation of Broadband over
Power Line Channel Capacity of Shipboard Power System Cables for Ship
Communication Networks
A. AKINNIKAWE, Texas
A&M University
K. BUTLER-PURRY, Texas
A&M University
• 09GM1139, Exploiting Intelligent Systems
Techniques within an Autonomous Regional Active Network Management System
E. DAVIDSON, University of
Strathclyde
S. MCARTHUR, University of
Strathclyde
M. DOLAN, University of
Strathclyde
J. MCDONALD, University of
Strathclyde
*SG* Power
System Stability Controls Subcommittee Meeting and FACTS and Wind Power Paper
Session
Sponsored by: Power System
Dynamic Performance Committee
Chair: C.
Canizares, University of Waterloo
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0749, Damping Subsynchronous Resonance
Using a STATCOM Operating in a Phase Imbalanced Mode
D. RAI, University of
Saskatchewan
G. RAMAKRISHNA, University
of Saskatchewan
S. FARIED, University of
Saskatchewan
A. EDRIS, Siemens Energy
• 09GM0307, Investigation of Positive Feedback
Anti-Islanding Control for Multiple Inverter-Based Distributed Generators [Transaction Number: TPWRS-WFreitas-2007002]
X. WANG, Tsinghua
University
• 09GM0940, Gramian-Based Reduction Method Applied
to Large Sparse Power System Descriptor Models [Transaction
Number: TPWRS.2008.926693]
F. FREITAS, University of
Brasilia
J. ROMMES, NXP
Semiconductors
N. MARTINS, CEPEL
• 09GM1203, Missing-Sensor-Fault-Tolerant
Control for SSSC FACTS Device with Real-Time Implementation [Transaction Number: TPWRD-00031-2008]
W. QIAO, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln
G. VENAYAGAMOORTHY,
Missouri University of Science and Technology
R. HARLEY, Georgia
Institute of Technology
• 09GM1173, Coordinated Reactive Power Control
of a Large Wind Farm and a STATCOM Using Heuristic Dynamic Programming [Transaction Number: TEC-WQiao-2001456]
W. QIAO, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln
R. HARLEY, Georgia
Institute of Technology
G. VENAYAGAMOORTHY,
Missouri University of Science and Technology
• 09GM0756, Resilient Operation of
Voltage-Source BTB HVDC Systems Under Power System Disturbances
B. PARKHIDEH, North
Carolina State University
S. BHATTACHARYA, North
Carolina State University
• 09GM0887, Power System Stabilizers in
Variable Speed Wind Farms
C. MARTINEZ, McGill
University
G. JOOS, McGill University
B. OOI, McGill University
• 09GM1049, Small Signal Stability Analysis of
a DFIG Based Wind Power System with Tuned Damping Controller Under
Super/Sub-synchronous Mode of Operation
Y. MISHRA, The University
of Tennessee
S. MISHRA, IIT Delhi
F. LI, The University of
Tennessee
Z. DONG, Hong Kong
Polytechnic University
• 09GM0838, Effect of Wind Turbine Output
Current During Faults on Grid Voltage and the Transient Stability of Wind Parks
I. ERLICH, University of
Duisburg-Essen
F. SHEWAREGA, University of
Duisburg-Essen
S. ENGELHARDT, Woodward SEG
GmbH & Co. KG
J. KRETSCHMANN, Woodward
SEG GmbH & Co. KG
J. FORTMANN, REpower
Systems AG
F. KOCH, REpower Systems AG
Generator Testing and Model Validation for Grid Code
Compliance
Sponsored by: Power System
Dynamic Performance Committee
Chair: P. Pourbeik,
EPRI
This panel has
six presentations that relate to the testing and model validation of power
plant equipment for the purpose of grid code compliance. In North America NERC
is imminently putting into effect standards that will govern the requirement to
periodically validate models associated with power plant equipment. WECC has
had similar standards in effect since 1997. Presentation will be given on the
imminent NERC standards, the experience of WECC with generator testing and
model validation in the past decade, by international presenters on experience
with grid code compliance for modeling overseas, and on the need for model
validation and the various ways to achieve this goal. Ample time will be
reserved at the end of the presentations for a group discussion with the
panelists. Generation owners, system
planners and system operators are highly encouraged to attend to take part in
this important and timely consultation on the subject of power plant model
validation.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1020, Testing and Model Validation for
South African Grid Code Compliance
F. MODAU, Eskom
• 09GM0879, Update on Development of NERC
Requirements for Verification of Generator Dynamic Models
L. TAYLOR, Southern Company
Services, Inc.
• 09GM1019, Generating Unit Model Validation:
WECC Lessons and Moving Forward
J. UNDRILL, JMU
L. PEREIRA, LP
D. KOSTEREV, BPA
S. PATTERSON, USBR
D. DAVIES, WECC
S. YANG, BPA
B. AGRAWAL, Arizona Public
Service Company
• 09GM1096, Dynamic Model Validation for
Compliance with NERC Standards
L. LIMA, Siemens PTI
M. FOGARTY, Kestrel Power
Engineering Ltd.
L. HAJAGOS, Kestrel Power
Engineering Ltd.
R. BERUBE, Kestrel Power
Engineering Ltd.
• 09GM0769,
Automated Parameter Derivation for Power Plant Models From System Disturbance
Data
P. POURBEIK, EPRI
Power System Stability Subcommittee and Recent
Applications of Linear Analysis Techniques Panel Session
Sponsored by: Power System
Dynamic Performance Committee
Chair: J. J.
Sanchez-Gasca, GE
Linear
analysis techniques often provide practical engineering insights into the
dynamic behavior of power systems that cannot by easily obtained by other means
of analysis. Their importance is underlined by frequent new developments and
applications. The objective of this
panel session is to illustrate the practical value of linear analysis
techniques as a means for acquiring a more complete understanding of power
system dynamic phenomena. The
presentations cover a wide range of applications and analysis methods.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0404, Application of Small-Signal
Stability Tools and Techniques to a Large Power System
P. POURBEIK, EPRI
T. CAIN, TVA
R. BOTTOMS, TVA
• 09GM1132, Overview of Algorithms for
Estimating Swing Modes form Measured Responses
D. TRUDNOWSKI, Montana Tech
J. PIERRE, University of
Wyoming
• 09GM1051, Analysis of Intra-area and Interarea
Oscillations in South-Eastern UCTE Interconnection
C. VOURNAS, NTUA
A. METSIOU, NTUA
V. NOMIKOS, HTSO
• 09GM1011, Benchmark Testing Methodology for
Continuous Modal-Estimation Algorithms
D. VOWLES, The University
of Adelaide
M. GIBBARD, The University
of Adelaide
D. GEDDEY, Transgrid
D. BONES, NEMMCO
• 09GM0953, Computation and Analysis of Power
System Voltage Oscillations from Interarea Modes
L. VANFRETTI, Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute
J. CHOW, Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute
• 09GM1368, Invariant Subspace Based Eigenvalue
Tracing for Power System Small-Signal Stability Analysis
C. LUO, Iowa State
University
V. AJJARAPU, Iowa State
University
• 09GM0520, Linear and Nonlinear Methods for
Contingency Analysis in On-Line Voltage Security Assessments
H. CHIANG, Cornell
University
L. JIN, CAISO
M. VARGHESE, CAISO
S. GHOSH, CAISO
H. LI, Bigwood-Systems
New Techniques for Synchronized Phasor Data Analysis
Sponsored by: Power System
Dynamic Performance Committee
Chairs: J. Chow, RPI
S. Mandal,
Entergy
Several panels
on phasor measurements were held in prior PES conferences, with significant
interests from the participants and audience.
This panel session will focus on new research and development in phasor
data analysis and applications in power systems not covered in prior panels.
The aim is allow PES conference attendees to be kept informed of the latest
activities in this fast moving technology development and application area.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1147, Application of Extended Kalman
Filter Techniques for Dynamic Model Parameter Calibration
Z. HUANG, Battelle -
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
P. DU, Battelle - Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory
D. KOSTEREV, Bonneville
Power Administration
B. YANG, Battelle - Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory
• 09GM0342, Electromechanical Mode Shape
Estimation Based on Transfer Function Identification Using PMU Measurements
N. ZHOU, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory (PNNL)
Z. HUANG, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory (PNNL)
L. DOSIEK, University of
Wyoming
D. TRUDNOWSKI, Montana Tech
of the University of Montana
J. PIERRE, University of
Wyoming
L. VANFRETTI, Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute
J. CHOW, Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute
S. SARAWGI, American
Electric Power
D. ELLIS, NYISO
B. FARDANESH, Manhattan
College
• 09GM0361, Double Line Outage Detection Using
Phasor Angle Measurements
J. TATE, University of
Toronto
T. OVERBYE, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
• 09GM1012, Monitoring the North American
Interconnections at Distribution Level
J. DONG, Virginia Tech
T. XIA, Virginia Tech
Y. ZHANG, Virginia Tech
Y. LIU, Virginia Tech
L. BEARD, Tennessee Valley
Authority
T. BILKE, Virginia Tech
• 09GM1473, Oscillation Monitoring System Using
Synchrophasors
G. LIU, Washington State
University
V. VENKATASUBRAMANIAN,
Washington State University
J. CARROLL, Tennessee
Valley Authority
*SG* Advanced
Metering Infrastructure and Smart Grid
Sponsored by: Power System
Instrumentation and Measurements Committee
Chair: E. So, NRC
Canada
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1372, A Synergistic Approach to Implement
Demand Response, Asset Management and Service Reliability Using Smart Metering,
AMI and MDM Systems
S. MAK, ACLARA Power Line
Technologies
• 09GM1375, Sweden – Reaching 100 % ‘Smart
Meters’ July 1, 2009
A. MANNIKOFF, SP Swedish
Technical Research Institute
H. NILSSON, SP Swedish
Technical Research Institute
• 09GM1376, Current Measurement Methods for the
Smart Grid
H. KIRKHAM, Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL)
• 09GM1377, Hydro One Smart Meter Initiative
Paves Way for Defining the Smart Grid of the Future
R. DAVIES, Hydro One
Experience with Operating Genco Assets in RTO Markets
Sponsored by: Power System
Operations Committee
Chair: K. Le, PCI
By early 2009,
roughly 60 % of the US capacity will operate in RTO markets. This panel session will discuss the key
challenges facing RTO operators and market participants in the new RTO-centric
world:
·
What
are the main physical and financial impacts of the new RTO markets on the
generation fleet?
·
Do
schedulers have the tools to accurately forecast hourly loads and prices for
the day-ahead and real-time markets?
·
What
is the best way to formulate hedging strategies for genco assets in LMP
markets?
·
How
should we value FTRs in LMP markets?
·
How
do ancillary-service markets operate?
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0625, Lessons Learned from Operating
Genco Assets in RTO Markets
K. LE, PCI
• 09GM1189, SPP’s Experience with
Operating the Energy Imbalance Market
R. DILLON, Southwest Power
Pool
• 09GM1218, PJM’s Experience with
Operating Energy and Ancillary-Service Markets
B. KESHAVAMURTHY, PJM
INTERCONNECTION
• 09GM0677, Operating Independent Power Plants
in Japanese Market: from Contract Management to Real-Time Operations
M. MARMIROLI, Mitsubishi
Electric Corporation
Y. TSUKAMOTO, Mitsubishi
Electric Corporation
• 09GM0335, Benefits of Fast-Response Devices
for System Regulation in ISO Markets
K. VU, KEMA
R. MASIELLO, KEMA
R. FIORAVANTI, KEMA
Equilibrium of Electricity Market Efficiency and Power
System Operation Risk: State-of-the-Art and Tomorrow
Sponsored by: Power System
Operations Committee
Chairs: H. Chen, PJM
L. A.
Barroso, PSR Inc.
Electricity
market operation and power system operation go hand in hand, and cannot be
decoupled. Competitive electricity markets are built on top of physical power
systems; reliable system operation needs to be integrated with economic market
operation. Market design tries to provide economic signals to system operation
risk mitigations. On this panel, experts
from industry and academia will provide overview and discussion of current
practices and proposed solutions, on the effort to achieve integrated efficient
market and system operation risk management, from long-term strategy to
real-time operation.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0689,
Electricity Market Equilibrium, Efficiency and Operation Risk: Observations
F. ALVARADO, LRCA
• 09GM0443, Long-term Security-Constrained Unit
Commitment for Reliability Analyses
M. SHAHIDEHPOUR, Illinois
Institute of Technology
Z. LI, Illinois Institute
of Technology
• 09GM0024, Economic Valuation of Reserves in
Power Systems with High Penetration of Wind Power [Transaction Number:
TPWRS-00211-2008]
J. MORALES, University
Castilla - La Mancha
A. CONEJO, University
Castilla - La Mancha
J. PEREZ-RUIZ, University
of Malaga
• 09GM1620,
How Capacity Markets Address Resource Adequacy
H. CHAO, New York ISO
D. LAWRENCE, New York ISO
• 09GM0301,
Reflecting Real Time Operation Business Practices in Market Design
E. LITVINOV, ISO New
England
F. ZHAO, ISO New England
T. ZHENG, ISO New England
• 09GM1013,
Balance Economic Efficiency and Operation Risk
H. CHEN, PJM
Interconnection
Sponsored by: Power System
Operations Committee
Chair: E.
Dobrowolski, NERC
The Control
Center Issues session is designed to provide a forum for topical discussions of
anything and everything having to do with utility control centers and their
operation. This session is provided at
every general meeting and is the centerpiece for control center discussion at
IEEE PES.
The program
this year is wide ranging and covers several different aspects of control
center operations: training and evaluation of operators, EMS architecture,
regulatory impacts on control centers, and experiences/lessons learned from
massive flooding of an area.
At the
conclusion of the formal presentations, the audience will be asked to provide
any pertinent information from their control center operations that may be of
value to the meeting attendees. The session will end with a planning discussion
to begin work on the session for GM10.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0146, System Operator
Testing/Evaluation/Assessment
P. EVERLY, OES-NA, LLC
• 09GM0742, Update on CIGRE D2.24 Initiative
P. SKARE, Siemens Energy
• 09GM0446, Impact of Regulatory Compliance on
Control Center Operations
N. SAINI, Entergy Services
Inc.
• 09GM0187, Operational Impacts from June 2008
Eastern Iowa Flooding
D. ACTON, Alliant Energy
*SG* Impact of
Wind Generation on Control Center Operations and New Tools to Mitigate Risks
Sponsored by: Power System
Operations Committee
Chair: S.
Nuthalapati, ERCOT
Wind
Generation is growing rapidly in many utilities and is making an impact in
operating the system because of the factors such as variations in wind
characteristics, location of wind generation resources, etc. This panel presents experiences of some
Independent System Operators (ISOs) in handling wind generation in their
control center operations.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1066, Wind Power Interconnection and
Integration Roadmap: An RTO’s Perspective
J. LIU, PJM Interconnection
LLC
D. SCHWEIZER, PJM
Interconnection LLC
K. SEILER, PJM
Interconnection LLC
• 09GM1431, Impact of Wind Generation on System
Operations in the Deregulated Environment: Ercot Experience
S. HUANG, ERCOT
D. MAGGIO, ERCOT
K. MCINTYRE, ERCOT
V. BETANABHATLA, ERCOT
J. DUMAS, ERCOT
J. ADAMS, ERCOT
• 09GM1227, Managing Wind Energy: From
Interconnection Planning to Real Time Operations, an Integrated Approach to
Ensure Energy and Transmission Capacity
D. MANJURE, Midwest ISO
M. MCMULLEN, Midwest ISO
D. SUBAKTI, Midwest ISO
D. TEWARI, Midwest ISO
• 09GM1505, Impacts of Integrating Wind
Resources into the California ISO Market Construct
C. LOUTAN, California ISO
T. YONG, California ISO
S. CHOWDHURY, California
ISO
A. CHOWDHURY, California
ISO
G. ROSENBLUM, California
ISO
Operational Experiences in Handling Contingencies in
Control Centers
Sponsored by: Power System
Operations Committee
Chair: S.
Nuthalpati, ERCOT
In addition to
ensuring that the system is operating in a secure state, it is also important
to make sure that system is operating in a secure state for any contingencies
that may occur in the system. Real-Time Contingency Analysis is an important
application function in a Control Center addressing this requirement. This panel presents operational experiences
of various control centers in handling contingencies in real-time.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1062,
Practices on Post-contingency Congestion Mitigation with Market Force
J. LIU, PJM Interconnection
LLC
H. CHEN, PJM
Interconnection LLC
• 09GM1028,
Managing Contingencies in Real Time Using EMS Advanced Network Applications
V. VINNAKOTA, BC
Transmission Corporation
Z. YAO, BC Transmission
Corporation
D. ATANACKOVIC, BC
Transmission Corporation
A. STEED, BC Transmission
Corporation
Q. ZHU, BC Transmission
Corporation
M. VARGHESE, CAISO
L. JIN, CAISO
S. GHOSH, CAISO
G. LIN, ABB
B. PEK, ABB
• 09GM1428, Real-Time Contingency Analysis
Methods to Mitigate Congestion in the ERCOT Region
C. THOMPSON, ERCOT
K. MCINTYRE, ERCOT
S. NUTHALAPATI, ERCOT
A. GARCIA, ERCOT
E. VILLANUEVA, ERCOT
M. RAOOT, PGCIL, India
P. PENTAYYA, PGCIL, India
S. KHAPARDE, I I T Bombay
*SG*
Transmission Planning with Wind Generators
Sponsored by: Power System
Planning and Implementation Committee
Chair: A. A.
Chowdhury, California ISO
Recently wind
power generation has seen increasing utilization throughout the world. Wind power, however, possesses quite
different characteristics than that of conventional generation sources due to
its intermittent and non-dispatchable nature.
Wind generators are normally considered as energy resources rather than
capacity resources in system planning and operating purposes. The capacity
benefit of wind power, however from system reliability performance standpoint
is highly dependent on many factors related to wind itself, such as the wind
regime at the site locations, the wind penetration level, and the correlation
between multiple wind farms in a system as well as the correlation between wind
speed and system load profiles. As a result, wind power generation poses
significant challenges to system planners and operators. This panel session
deals with a number of system planning and operating issues associated with
wind generators. The panel brings in academia and practicing engineers to
discuss different wind modeling and application challenges in increased wind
penetration environment.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0483, Impact of DFIG Based Wind Turbine
Generators on Transient and Small Signal Stability of Power Systems
D. GAUTAM, Arizona State
University
V. VITTAL, Arizona State
University
W. WANGDEE, British
Columbia Transmission Corporation
W. LI, British Columbia
Transmission Corporation
W. SHUM, British Columbia
Transmission Corporation
P. CHOUDHURY, British
Columbia Transmission Corporation
• 09GM0974, Reliability Assessment of Wind
Integration in Operating and Planning of Generation Systems
Y. ZHANG, CAISO
A. CHOWDHURY, CAISO
• 09GM1293, Transmission Evaluation of Large
New Renewable Generation Interconnections at the California ISO
A. CHOWDHURY, California
ISO
Y. ZHANG, California ISO
H. LIU, California ISO
S. ZHU, California ISO
D. LE, California ISO
• 09GM1393, A Conceptual Study on Reliability
Constrained Transmission System Planning Including Wind Power
L. WANG, Texas A&M
University
C. SINGH, Texas A&M
University
• 09GM1524, A Novel Voltage Stability
Assessment Tool to Incorporate Wind Variability
P. VIJAYAN, Iowa State
University
S. SARKAR, Iowa State
University
V. AJJARAPU, Iowa State
University
Solving Major Challenges in Transmission Asset
Investment in Competitive Environment
Sponsored by: Power System
Planning and Implementation Committee
Chairs: A. A.
Chowdhury, California ISO
G. Gross,
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
The panel will
address many challenges that arise in the area of transmission investment for
expanding and improving the grid. The
management of uncertainty, an inherent characteristic of any planning activity,
is far more complex and complicated in the new competitive environment than
under the traditional vertically integrated structure. The need for effective incentives to
stimulate investment is a major requirement.
The growth in the addition of renewable and distributed energy resources
and their integration into the grid poses myriad challenges. The uncertainty in the regulatory climate is
another important barrier. The panel
brings together participants and academic experts in the transmission
investment area to explore and discuss the challenging problems faced and the
approaches proposed and in use for addressing them. The panel will consider the
technical, operational, technology application, environmental, economic and
policy aspects of the issues in transmission investment.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
L. BARROSO, PSR
F. PORRUA, PSR
M. PEREIRA, PSR
B. BEZERRA, PSR
• 09GM0860, Formulation of Incentives for
Decentralized Transmission Asset Investments
J. CONTRERAS, University of
Castilla - La Mancha
G. GROSS, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
• 09GM1034, The Transmission Investment Debacle
G. GROSS, UIUC
• 09GM1117, Grid Development in France and in
Europe: The New Paradigm
P. BORNARD, RTE
T. VEYRENC, RTE
• 09GM1544, Application of California ISO
Transmission Economic Assessment Methodology (TEAM) for the Sunrise Powerlink
Project
A. CHOWDHURY, California
ISO
D. LE, California ISO
Generation and Transmission Planning Tools in the
Deregulated Paradigm
Sponsored by: Power System
Planning and Implementation Committee
Chair: S. Varadan,
KEMA Inc.
With the
advent of deregulation, the role of transmission planning has become even more
critical in ensuring that the “lights stay on.” While in the past,
transmission planning was effectively carried out in a vertically integrated
utility paradigm where accurate load forecasts and generation plans were readily
available, deregulation has brought about profound changes. For one,
transmission planning is done by multiple entities now and needs a coordinated
approach to solving the problem of meeting regional demand. Thus the “Plan Global, Build Local”
paradigm is becoming increasingly common.
This has led to the present situation where tools that facilitate
Integrated Resource Planning in the context of deregulated energy markets are
becoming popular. In this panel session,
we will focus on issues related to the following: 1) What resources do
transmission planners need access to? 2)
What functionality is needed in software tools to aid the transmission
planner? 3) What “new” tools
need to be developed to assist with these new requirements? 4) What are the data requirements of such
planning tools? 5) Who are the vendors that provide such solutions? 6) What are the significant features of these
software solutions? How do they meet the planner’s needs?
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1044, Integrated Generation &
Transmission Planning and System Expansion
A. CHOWDHURY, California
ISO
D. LE, California ISO
• 09GM1053, Integrated Generation and
Transmission Planning Tools Under Competitive Energy Markets: An Academic
Perspective
F. LI, The University of
Tennessee
H. YUAN, Washington State
University
K. TOMSOVIC, The University
of Tennessee
• 09GM1204,
Integrated Generation and Transmission Planning Tools – PTO Perspective
R. AGGARWAL, Bonneville
Power Administration
W. MITTELSTADT, Independent
Consultant
• 09GM1289, Concorda – An Integrated
Power Systems Analysis Suite
S. VENKATARAMAN, General
Electric
G. JORDAN, General Electric
D. VAN ZANDT, General
Electric
Fundamentals and Case Studies of Power System Planning
Sponsored by: Power System
Planning and Implementation Committee
Chair: M.
Henderson, ISO-New England
This session
will include discussions of the power system planning process used in the
deregulated environment. Case studies
will be also be presented that address power system planning issues that
include studies of resource adequacy, production cost and environmental
emissions, transmission analyses, dynamic system response, etc.
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM1150, Resource Adequacy Assessment
Considering Transmission and Generation via Market Simulations
H. CHAO, NYISO
G. SIMAAN, NYISO
• 09GM1229,
Midwest ISO Transmission Planning Processes
D. OSBORN, Midwest ISO
J. LAWHORN, Midwest ISO
• 09GM1302, Power System Planning Process and
Issues
M. HENDERSON, ISO New
England
P. WONG, ISO New England
J. PLATTS, ISO New England
• 09GM1113, Importance of Dynamic Stability
Phenomena in Power System Planning
E. ALLEN, NERC
A. KERI, American Electric
Power
A. DEGROFF, American
Electric Power
D. KOSTEREV, Bonneville
Power Administration
P. TATRO, National Grid USA
• 09GM0983, Demand or Request: Will Load
Behave?
S. WIDERGREN, Pacific
Northwest National Lab
• 09GM1301, Demand Response Issues and
Experience in New England
M. HENDERSON, ISO New
England
R. BURKE, ISO New England
P. WONG, ISO New England
*SG*
Incorporating Smart Grid into Power System Planning to Optimize
Capex/Opex, System Reliability, and Carbon Footprint
Sponsored by: Power System
Planning and Implementation Committee
Chair: M. L. Chan,
Quanta Technology
PRESENTATIONS
AND PANELISTS:
• 09GM0902, Power System Considerations of
Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on a Multi Energy Carrier Model
M. GALUS, ETH Zurich
G. ANDERSSON, ETH Zurich
• 09GM1250, A Review of Challenges to Real-Time
Power Management of Microgrids
C. COLSON, Montana State
University
H. NEHRIR, Montana State
University