| Introduction
Non-line-of-sight ultraviolet (NLOS UV) communication is well matched
to the problem of providing short-range links between wireless nodes,
such as unattended ground sensors. The concept for NLOS UV relies upon
two related phenomena. The first is that atmospheric gases, particularly
ozone and oxygen, are strong absorbers of light in the spectral region
between 200nm to 280nm, so that the amount of solar radiation reaching
the ground in this waveband is negligible. In essence, it is always
the darkest of nights in this “solar-blind” region of the
spectrum, regardless of the time of day. The second related phenomenon
is that in the solar blind region of the spectrum, UV light generated
at the earth’s surface is strongly scattered.
Plots of the scattering, absorption, and extinction coefficients, as
well as the normalized phase functions for both molecular and aerosol
scattering, are shown in Figure 1. The testbed described in this article
operates at a wavelength of 274nm corresponding to a nominal extinction
coefficient of 1.1km-1. For ground-to-ground communication link geometries,
the scattering angles of interest lie in the range of 90 to 135 degrees
where isotropic molecular (Rayleigh) scattering dominates and the contribution
from aerosol scattering is negligible.
 |
| Figure 1: Plots of the coefficients of
absorption, scattering and extinction for combined molecular and
aerosol contributions (left) and the normalized scattering phase
function for aerosols at three UV wavelengths and for molecular
Rayleigh scattering (right) |
The concept of exploiting the absence of solar background
and the strong scattering to realize non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communication
links was first published by Sunstein[1]. A number of demonstration
systems were subsequently pursued but never fielded, due in part to
limitations of source technology, as well as operational concepts that
demanded minimal operational ranges of several kilometers[2].
 |
| Figure 2: Depiction of a non-line-of-sight
UV communication link between unattended ground sensors. The transmitter
launches a broad UV beam upwards, and isotropic scattering by atmospheric
gases returns a diffuse signal to a large area on the ground. Wide
field of view receivers on the ground detect the flux from within
this scattering volume and demodulate the message. |
More recently, it was recognized that NLOS UV communication links are
well-suited to the problem of providing short-range links between wireless
nodes, such as unattended ground sensors[3-9]. Figure 2 illustrates
the basic concept in which UV light from a zenith-pointed transmit beam
is scattered isotropically by well-mixed atmospheric gases. As a result,
a weak signal, in the form of scattered UV light, is returned to the
ground in a radius around the transmitter. For a wide field of view
(WFOV) receiver at ranges less than the UV extinction length (nominally
1km), the strength of the scattered signal returned to the ground decays
inversely with range from the transmitter. A WFOV receiver placed anywhere
within the effective radius of the scattered light intercepts a signal
proportional to the active area of the detector. An important feature
of these NLOS comm links is that terrain elevation changes and ground-level
obstructions that would preclude ground-level line-of-sight (LOS) links,
have no impact on the performance of the NLOS link. This insensitivity
to ground-level obstructions suggests that NLOS UV comm links may provide
higher availability than RF links, not only in undeveloped areas, but
also in urban environments, where buildings and other ground-level obstructions
often induce an RF propagation loss that is proportional to the sixth
power of range. The key attributes of UV comm links, and examples of
potential application domains, are summarized in Figure 3.
 |
| Figure 3: Attributes, functions, and representative
scenarios for the application of non-line-of-sight UV comm links. |
UV Transceiver Technology Transmitter
Technology
Until recently, small, low-cost UV sources were limited to low-pressure
mercury lamps, which are less than ideal for use in outdoor wireless
communication links due to their temperature sensitivity, fragility,
and limited modulation bandwidths. The DARPA Semiconductor Ultraviolet
Optical Source (SUVOS) program, initiated in 2002, has focused on developing
semiconductor LED and laser sources in the deep UV, including solar-blind
LEDs. Several generations of UV LEDs have been developed under the SUVOS
program. Figure 4 summarizes the measured performance of a 274nm 24-element
array procured from Sensor Electronics Technology, Inc. Multiple array
packages can be employed to implement higher-power sources, and we are
presently assembling a 50mW source using this approach. These sources
are research-grade LEDs, but with sufficiently long lifetimes to justify
fabrication of multi-element arrays.
 |
| Figure 4: 274nm LED array mounted in TO3
package and associated drive electronics. |
 |
| Figure 5: Perkin Elmer channel photomultiplier
model MP-1921, and associated quantum efficiency as a function of
wavelength |
Receiver Technology
Detection of NLOS UV signals differs from conventional LOS FSO comm
in two important respects. First, from the perspective of the detector,
the signal source is not located at a point, but appears as diffuse
molecular scattering occurring over a relatively wide field of view.
Second, since the background flux in the solar-blind spectral region
is negligible, quantum-limited detection is possible even with wide
field of view optics. Consequently, photon-counting detectors with low
dark count rates are required to achieve the best possible performance.
The two main components in the UV receiver are the detector and the
visible blocking, or “solar-blind,” filter. For NLOS UV
communication, the ideal detector should provide a large active area,
a solar-blind spectral response, and an extremely low dark current density.
Our testbed currently utilizes a Perkin Elmer MP-1921 channel photomultiplier
(CPM) with an active area of 1.8cm2, and a dark-count rate of <10
cps. The CPM and associated quantum efficiency curve are shown in Figure
5. The CPM offers the ultimate in photon-counting detector performance
for the testbed. However, in terms of size, power, and cost, semiconductor
detectors offer potential advantages over photomultipliers. Consequently,
there is interest in replacing the CPM with a semiconductor detector
even though detection performance may degrade.
Detectors fabricated from wide-bandgap semiconductors such as aluminum
gallium nitride exhibit a sharp spectral roll-off above 300nm that supplements
the filter suppression of both visible and near-infrared light. In addition,
the quantum efficiency of semiconductor detectors is significantly better
than that of photoemissive materials. However, photoemissive detectors
currently achieve 5 to 6 orders of magnitude lower dark count rate per
unit area than semiconductor detectors. The dark count rate per unit
area is a critical factor for NLOS communication, where background flux
is negligible, and the signal flux is low. The higher dark currents
in wide-bandgap semiconductor photodetectors presently preclude photon-counting
implementations. However, avalanche photodiodes (APDs) are an area of
active research and low dark-current APDs operated in Geiger mode may
someday provide an alternative to the CPM detector.
 |
| Figure 6: Matching the UV LED sources to
the spectral bandpass of the detector/filter combination improves
throughput, which extends range. Overlaid on the bandpass of the
solar absorption filter are the spectra of two different sources,
one from Sandia National Laboratories and the other from Sensor
Electronics Technology. |
4.1 UV source-detector matching
In order to take full advantage of the absence of solar background below
280nm, the UV receiver must successfully block all detectable visible
and IR flux outside of this band. The visible blocking filter employed
in the testbed is a composite structure, consisting of a specially grown
hydrated nickel sulfate crystal backed up by a near-IR blocking layer
and an organic filter layer. The visible band transmission is below
10-10, however transmission increases to around 10-6 at 900nm. By combining
this filter with a detector with low sensitivity in the near-IR, the
overall rejection ratio exceeds 1010 in the visible through IR bands.
The spectral bandpass of the solar-blind absorption filter is shown
in Figure 6, overlaid with the emission spectra of two different UV
LEDs. Proper wavelength matching between the LED and the solar-blind
filter can significantly improve throughput. The 5nm spectral mismatch
between the SNL LED and filter passband shown in Figure 6 reduces the
system throughput by a factor of two.
 |
| Figure 7: NLOS field measurements (solid
lines) agree well with single-scatter model predictions (dotted
lines). Differences between data and model predictions are due in
part to variations in atmospheric scattering and absorption. Data
were collected using a variety of source arrays. Weather influences
the received signal, as shown by the differences between the 5/7/04
dataset (clear sky conditions) and the 6/1/04 dataset (heavy overcast). |
Field-Measurements
Over a period of a year, field measurements have been made under a variety
of atmospheric conditions with increasingly more powerful solar-blind
UV source arrays. The array sources used and associated measurements
are summarized in Figure 7. Also shown in Figure 7 are propagation model
predictions of the received photons per pulse. Note that the propagation
model predicts, and the data confirms, that the volumetric scattering
associated with NLOS comm links leads to a range-dependent propagation
loss proportional to R-1, rather than the usual R-2 or higher order
exponential. The linear dependence of propagation loss on range is an
important feature of NLOS comm, since it eases the constraints on the
placement (range separation) of unattended ground sensors. From the
data of Figure 7, we conclude that with appropriate waveform modulation
and channel coding, the 24-element UV array can support communication
links to 50m or more. The 50mW array currently under development will
enable a ~10x increase in bandwidth over the same range, a 10x increase
in range at the same bandwidth, or any proportional combination of the
two.
Summary and Conclusions
A modular solar-blind UV communication testbed employing 274nm LED sources
has been developed and employed to make field measurements. The measurements
have shown good agreement with a single-scatter propagation model and
lead us to conclude that UV LED arrays can support NLOS UV communication
links at kilobit data rates and at ranges up to 100m using omni-directional,
zenith-pointed beams. A 50mW array is under construction and will be
used to demonstrate NLOS links at ranges of 100m and nominal bit rates
of 1kbps.
Acknowledgements
This work was sponsored by DARPA under contract FA8721-05-C-0002. Opinions,
interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors,
and not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government.
References
[1] D. E. Sunstein, “A Scatter Communications Link at Ultraviolet
Frequencies,” Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1968.
[2] B. Charles, B. Hughes, A. Erickson, “ An ultraviolet laser
based communication system for short range tactical applications,”
Proceedings SPIE Vol. 2115, pp. 79-86, 25-26 January 1994.
[3] G. A. Shaw, M. L. Nischan, M. Iyengar, S. Kaushik, and M. K. Griffin,
“NLOS UV Communication for Distributed Sensor Systems”,
Proceedings SPIE Vol. 4126, 2000.
[4] G. A. Shaw, M. L. Nischan, “ Short-Range NLOS Ultraviolet
Communication Test Bed and Measurements,” Proceedings SPIE Vol.
4396, 2001.
[5] G. A. Shaw, A. M. Siegel, M. L. Nischan, “Demonstration System
And Applications for Compact Wireless Non-Line of Sight UV Communication,”
Proceedings SPIE Vol. 5071, 2003.
[6] A. M. Siegel, G. A. Shaw, J. Model, “Short-Range Communication
with ultraviolet LEDs,” Proceedings SPIE Vol. 5530, August 2004.
[7] G. A. Shaw, A. M. Siegel, J. Model, M. L. Nischan , “Field
Testing and Evaluation of a Solar-Blind UV Communication Link for Unattended
Ground Sensors,” Proceedings SPIE, Vol. 5417, 2004.
[8] D. Reilly, D. Moriarty, J. Maynard, “Unique properties of
solar blind ultraviolet communication systems for unattended ground
sensor networks,” Proceedings SPIE, Vol. 5611, 2004.
[9] G. A. Shaw, A. M. Siegel, J. Model, D. Greisokh, “Recent Progress
in Short-Range Ultraviolet Communication,” Proceedings SPIE, Vol.
5796, Orlando, FL, 2005.

|