Technical Committees

FUSION TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE
Ed. note: The following is a report by the Chair of the Fusion Technology Standing Committee to update the community on this preeminent project in the world of magnetic confinement fusion
U.S. ITER Project Office Prepares for ITER Involvement; Discussions Continue on ITER Siting

A U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science review of the U.S. Contributions to ITER was held in Oak Ridge from March 22-24. The U.S. contributions are currently “provisional” since the negotiated details need to be finalized after an agreement on ITER siting and other details are concluded. The provisional scope includes 4 of 7 modules of the superconducting central solenoid; the steady-state power supplies; 16% of the diagnostic instrumentation; 44% of the ICRH antennae and all associated transmission lines, rf sources and power supplies; the ECH start-up gyrotrons and all associated transmission lines and power supplies; 10% of the blanket/shield; the Tokamak Exhaust Processing System; the cooling water system required for the divertor and vacuum vessel; and vacuum roughing pumps and standard vacuum components for the guard and service vacuum systems and for the heating systems.
The purpose of the review was to evaluate the project’s readiness for setting the preliminary baseline cost range - so-called “Critical Decision-1,” or “CD-1.” This is one of a series of prerequisites that must be met in order to obtain approval for construction. The review team consisted of experts in the various technology and management areas who evaluated the subsystem scopes of work, costs, schedules, and risk management plans which were presented by members of the U.S. ITER Project Office (USIPO). The USIPO is jointly managed by the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and was established in July 2004 (please refer to the September 2004 IEEE / NPSS Newsletter article “US ITER Project Office Announced” for more details). Also reviewed were a number of documents required for CD-1, including an Acquisition Strategy for procurements, a Preliminary Project Execution Plan, Risk Analysis, Preliminary Cost Range and Schedule, and a Conceptual Design Report which includes an analysis of alternatives. The reviewers made a number of suggestions which are presently being addressed in preparation of formal submittal of these documents for CD-1 approval request in the next month or so. Once CD-1 approval is granted, work can begin on the preliminary design activities whose major goal is to establish a cost baseline.
Japan is proposing a site in Rokkashomura in northern Japan, while France is proposing a site in Cadarache, southern France. There has been a strong recent increase in the pace of negotiations between Japan and the European Union on the issue of ITER siting after a year of relatively little activity which gives hope that the impasse may be resolved soon.
Phil Heitzenroeder can be reached at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, P.O. Box 451, Princeton, NJ 08543-0451; Phone: +1 609 243 3043; E-mail:pheitzen@pppl.gov.

Sectional View of the ITER Tokamak (Courtesy of ITER)

 


Philip Heitzenroeder
Chair, Fusion Technology Technical Committee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


If you would like to contact the IEEE Webmaster
© Copyright 2005, IEEE. Terms & Conditions. Privacy & Security

return to contents
IEEE logo