|
IEEE Fiscal State of Affairs: V
As we
left 2001, IEEE finances suffered from the double whammy of an optimistic
view of investments vs. the actual market slump. Even a heroic
performance in operations could not offset the red ink from investment
losses. Halfway through 2002, the operating lessons have been remembered
and augmented, the investment lesions have not worsened, and the
02 forecast is tracking the budget expectations. As we review financial
events since our last report, four headings of our previous discussions
are still appropriate:
1. Selection and management of initiative programs
within the Institute,
2. Periodic review of the Corporate Infrastructure
activities
3. A closer look at (read simplification of)
the complicated set of business rules that are required to support
the many offerings of the Societies and Councils,
4. A financial model that more properly allocates
expenses among users.
1. Initiative Programs:
As one of the principles of the IEEE financial model
(see 4. below), new and continuing initiatives will be capped by
dividend and interest income. A process for initiative approval
has been established. The New Initiative Committee of the Board
of Directors has met to review initial submissions of ideas for
possible funding in 2003. Of the 17 ideas submitted, the Committee
has asked that 9 be developed into formal business plans for further
consideration. These refined proposals are due to the Committee
by 8 July. Following those submissions, the Committee will
review the proposals and make a recommendation to the IEEE Executive
Committee (ExCom) at its August meeting as to which initiatives
should be funded. In turn, the ExCom will then send forth a recommendation
to the IEEE Board of Directors for incorporation into the 2003 IEEE
Operating Budget on which the Board will vote at its November meeting.
If you have any questions about the process or status of any initiatives,
please feel free to contact Matt Loeb in Piscataway at +1 732 562-5320
or via e-mail at m.loeb@ieee.org.
2. Infrastructure Charge Distribution within
TAB:
Recall that past discussion in this column dealt
with the distribution among TAB Societies and Councils of the direct
infrastructure costs, so-called because of the relatively direct
relationship of these costs to activities such as headcount, membership,
and expenses. We developed pay-by-the-drink philosophy to
deal with these within TAB, and called it the Principles Method.
And finally, this method of distributing these direct infrastructure
expenses will be phased in over a 3-year period. Some follow-up
activities to this process have been identified, since our last
discussion, including:
A. Collecting accurate cost data for these expenses
and benchmarking them to competitive costs for similar
services.
B. Preparing a collection of best practices
that S/Cs can use when considering changes in their operations that
may reduce their share of Infrastructure allocations.
In short, the process of identifying these costs,
distributing them equitably among the operating units of the Institute,
and within each operating unit (of which TAB is one) is complete.
The next part of the process, benchmarking and lowering these costs,
has now been defined and both of these activities encourage proper
financial behavior and will work toward lowering these direct infrastructure
costs.
Well what of the indirect infrastructure costs?
For the 2002 budget, indirect costs are allocated based on
three methodologies: ASPP revenue tax, Book Broker revenue tax,
and Reserves. The first pass 2003 budget has those costs allocated
based on expenses (less conference expenses). A TAB committee reported
on its recommendations for assigning these costs at the June TAB
meeting, but lack of consensus around the suggestions will require
additional refinements and another try at the November meeting.
3. Membership Services-Related Business Rule
Simplification
In November 2001, the BoD charged RAB and TAB with
identifying business rule changes to realize a possible $3M annual
savings in infrastructure charges associated with membership services.
RAB and TAB Business Rule Simplification teams have been working
the details since February. TAB committee discussion has focussed
on simplifying the options available for Society membership, and
the subscription process for members regarding optional Society
publications. The TAB Strategic Planning and Review Committee led
a wider discussion on the value proposition of Society Membership
and optional publications. TAB FinCom became involved on issues
of pricing strategy. Two principles of membership and publication
pricing were socialized at TAB:
1. Membership dues should recover the variable costs
of servicing Members (Here and in the following, variable
cost is the cost of servicing the next Member).
2. Prices for Society optional publications to Members
should recover their variable costs.
The reception of these principles within the June
TAB meeting was mixed, and broader consensus needs to be reached.
The simplification exercise is to reduce the number of options to
select Society membership and optional publications available from
Societies. Reducing the distinction among members eligible
for reduced rates will help. This category presently includes student,
unemployed, low income, retired, permanent member, and life member
grades. Can business rule simplification take place while maintaining
member benefits? Stay tuned; better yet, participate.
RAB is addressing other details of Membership Business
Rules simplification. Already, rule simplifications have been put
into place that will realize annual savings of about $300K, starting
in 2003.
4. Financial Model and the Budget Update
IEEE Budget principles adopted at the November Board
of Directors Meeting for the 2002 Budget are serving as a
template for the 2003 Budget development. The first order principles,
approved at the June BoD meeting, include:
-
The operating budget will be balanced (bottom line equal to
or greater than zero). Individual Operating Units (OUs), which
includes TAB, will also have balanced operating budgets, including
any applied infrastructure charges.
-
Investment income is NOT part of the operating budget. Dividends
& Interest (D&I) will be budgeted, but used specifically
to fund new and continuing initiatives. Any excess D&I
income will be used to reduce infrastructure charges.
-
Other investment income surplus/loss will be distributed proportionally
to those OUs with reserves.
In addition, a process and timeline have been identified
for developing the budget. With principles and process now well
defined, 2003 budget development has begun, but is a bit behind
schedule because of the lingering approval period for the 2002 budget.
The April 2002 Institute forecast is on target to
break-even. TAB and Standards are feeling the strain of their challenge
budgets, but increases in revenue and savings in infrastructure
make up their shortfalls.
Discussion
Direct
infrastructure costs have been identified, and a method for distribution
has been approved. The stage is now set for comparing these costs
to others, determining best practices, and driving costs down in
this area. Distribution methods for indirect infrastructure
expenses are being addressed. Business Rules Simplification efforts
have begun within the area of Membership Services. The financial
model is defined, understood, and is being applied to the 2003 budget
process. Additional substantial cuts to infrastructure are planned
for 2003 to further streamline operations. Finally, in its June
meeting, the BOD has approved an external review of the IEEE Corporate
infrastructure expenses with the goal of determining their value
and their costs. The RFP for this has been completed and the expectations
are to have the engagement completed by November. In summary,
methods for improving the financial health of the Institute are
proceeding along both tactical and strategic fronts. If this keeps
up, I will have to talk about one of my other interests, Publications
activities, next time! As always, your comments and suggestions
are welcome.
Peter Staecker, the Division IV Director, can
be reached at 167 Cedar Street, Lexington, MA 02421; Phone:
+1 781 861-7643; Fax: +1 781 863-5751; E-mail: p.staecker@ieee.org
|