The world's leading professional association
for the advancement of technology
Text size »A  A  A  
IEEE History Center
Expand Menu
Expand Menu
About the History Center
Expand Menu
Expand Menu
Expand Menu
Historical Resources
Publications

 IEEE Global History Network

 IEEE History Center
Rutgers-The State University
39 Union Street
New Brunswick, NJ USA
08901-8538
+1-732-932-1066 (Office)
+1-732-932-1193 (Fax)
ieee-history@ieee.org



IEEE History Center: Norman Ramsey Abstract

Printable Format
Printer Friendly


Norman Ramsey Oral History

Norman Ramsey is a physicist best known for his development of the separated oscillatory field method of measurement and for his work in magnetic resonance. He received his bachelor's degree in pre engineering at Columbia University. Ramsey attended Cambridge University on fellowship, ultimately receiving his Ph.D. in physics at Columbia with I.I. Robby, and wrote his dissertation on magnetic resonance and measurement methods. After a post-doctoral appointment at the Carnegie Institution in Washington, Ramsey worked briefly at the University of Illinois in 1940. During World War II he worked on radar and magnetron development at MIT's Radiation Lab; later, he became an expert advisor to the Secretary of War, working first at the Pentagon and then at Los Alamos, where he worked on bomb shape testing at Dahlgren proving ground. After the war, Ramsey returned to Columbia, where he and Rabi established the Brookhaven National Laboratory with Robby. Ramsey was head of the physics department at Brookhaven and professor at Columbia until he moved to Harvard in 1947, where he continues to work as a professor. The interview begins with the circumstances of Ramsey's education at Columbia and Cambridge and then provides some detail about Ramsey's doctoral work with Robby on magnetic resonance and measurement. Ramsey discusses his work at the Rad Lab, the Pentagon, and Los Alamos during World War II, and then describes the establishment of Brookhaven National Laboratory and his work at Harvard, including his participation in the development of the separated oscillatory field method and its various applications, discussing the relationship between technology and its applications and the roles physicists and engineers play in the development of applications. Throughout the interview, Ramsey compares and contrasts physicists' and engineers' work habits, motivations, and general philosophies, noting that at many times in his career he as a physicist functioned as an engineer, usually when he had to make his own apparatus for a particular experiment. He suggests that there are, overall, too many similarities between physics and engineering for there to be a real acid test to determine who fell into which category. After treating several of his research projects from the 1960s and 1970s, the interview concludes with a discussion of Ramsey's use of IEEE journals for background information related to engineering.

See also Interview #105, Norman Ramsey (June 20, 1991)


Table of Contents

 

  1. Early interest in physics and engineering
  2. Education Pre engineering at Columbia
  3. Columbia Cambridge
    University Nuclear physics at Cambridge
    Theoretical physics background
  4. Nuclear magnetic moments I.I.
    Rabi Molecular beams predecessors of NMR, MRI
  5. Ph.D. thesis on magnetic resonance
    Magnetic resonance and measurement methods
    Thesis: measuring magnetic moment of proton and deuteron
  6. Experiments with HD brings sharp resonance Thesis work
  7. H2, D2 measurements Deuterons
  8. Engineering aspects of physics; had to make apparatus
    Engineers become physicists; physicists become engineers
    Post-doc at Carnegie Institution
  9. Short career at University of Illinois in 1940 World War II American research on Rada
  10. Battle of Britain; RAF and radar Radio location
    Need for shorter wavelengths
    Ten-centimeter radar
    High-power magnetron: Randall, Oliphant, Boot
  11. Magnetron and National Defense Research Council
    Alfred Loomis, microwave committee Radar
  12. Radiation Lab at MIT E.G. Bowen
  13. Naming the Rad Lab Rabi and magnetron at Rad Lab
  14. Advanced development group Three-centimeter magnetrons Microwave hardware
  15. Waveguide design Columbia; nuclear magnetic resonance Prewar engineering curriculum
  16. Physicists were primary leaders in the Rad Lab Development of radar Development of systems, towards applications Night fighter aircraft interceptor at 3 cm Air to surface radar, 3 cm--submarine detection
  17. Air to surface radar H2X system Engineering work Navy laboratory management, getting radar in Becomes expert consultant to secretary of War (Navy)
  18. Assigned to requirements branch
    Five-year procurement plan for radar for Army Air Corps
  19. Five-year procurement plant for radar for Army Air Corps
    Rad Labs add new radars
    Left Pentagon; to Los Alamos
  20. Los Alamos lab Tests at Dahlgren proving ground about bomb shapes
  21. Los Alamos Bomb engineering
  22. Bomb engineering at Los Alamos
  23. Kit bomb assembly
  24. Return to Columbia to start experiments
    Helped establish Brookhaven National Laboratory with Rabi
    Head of physics department at Brookhaven
    Professor at Columbia Lured to Harvard; at Harvard since 1947
    Making a molecular beam resonance apparatus
    Wanting to make magnetic fields better
  25. Construction of the Harvard cyclotron
    Separated oscillatory field method
  26. Separated oscillatory field method
  27. Physics motivation; engineering concerns
  28. Applications to higher frequency standards and atomic clocks
    Specialized knowledge of electrical engineering; Rad Lab
    First Rad Lab device manufactured at Harvard
    Measuring power on first British ten centimeter magnetrons
  29. Condon and Shortley, "Theory of the Atomic Spectra"
    Condon wrote guide to microwaves for them
    Wave guide knowledge at MIT Rad Lab
  30. Adaptability of physicists at Rad Lab
    Colloquium on impedance
    War meant incentive to aim for applications
    Fundamental research not discouraged during war
  31. Physicist will be more interested in theory than engineer
    Motivation differences between physicist and engineer
  32. Individual creativity
    Rationality/irrationality of the creative process
    Separated oscillatory field research
    Stimulation and creativity
  33. Optics lecture as inspiration
  34. Need for time spent just thinking
    Problem of too much prior knowledge, can block thinking
    Technological developments come from science
    Believes scientists are happy to see applications
  35. Publishing on atomic clock application
    Appreciates having others take ideas over Hydrogen maser
  36. Publications Scientific innovations; engineering tradition
  37. Testing U.S. and British ten-centimeter radar TR box
    British ahead of U.S. on crystals
  38. Development of crystal John Bardeen, theoretical physicists William Shockley
  39. Similarities between physics and engineering Apparatus: practical needs vs. understanding of theory
  40. Guesswork in physics SSC and spin-off technology
    Atomic clocks, counting devices in history of computing
    Particle physics and data transmission
  41. WWW at CERN Particle physics and engineering developments
    Harvard cyclotron now used more for medicine
    Magnetic resonance
    Wrote first theoretical paper on chemical shift
    Nuclear shielding in molecules
  42. Magnetic shielding paper; nice general theory but hard to fulfill
  43. From magnetic shielding to chemical shifts
    President of University's Research Association for 16 years
    Constructed and operated Fermi Lab
    Cyclotron construction
  44. Cyclotron: engineering problem for scientific purposes
    Ramsey as manager; not a very good designer
    Robert Wilson physicist, sculptor, good at designing
    Good teamwork
  45. Making equipment, esp. computers
    Doesn't often make effort to patent equipment he makes
    No patent on separated oscillatory field
  46. Did patent hydrogen maser
    Problem of time limits on patents
  47. Physical intuition on physical systems, engineering problems
    Must also think of new ideas
    Research in 1960s and 1970s
    Molecular beams devices to measure interactions in molecules
    Discovery of new interactions
  48. Parity testing
    Time reversal symmetry
    Looking for a long range tension force between two particles
  49. Separated oscillatory field development; improvements
    Data reduction, theoretical analysis of improvements
    Neutron electric diode pole moment in Grenoble, France
    Automated to run by computers
    Engineering literature, IEEE journals
  50. Reading habits IEEE Spectrum for engineering material: background, ideas

IEEE Home   |   Sitemap   |   Search   |   Privacy & Security   |   Terms & Conditions
 
IEEE Logo